Ramp ссылки rampbestmarket com

Cinyvyfe

Модератор
Подтвержденный
Сообщения
202
Реакции
29
Уважаемые пользователи RuTOR , Все сайты из нашего списка проверены и находятся онлайн, их нет в скам листах. Остерегайтесь фишинг сайтов и помните об уголовной ответственности за незаконные сделки. Подборка официальных сайтов по продаже веществ от форума Rutor носит исключительно информативный характер.

1. OMG!OMG - MOST ADVANCED DARKMARKET

Эта площадка существует довольно давно и в этот период она медленно развивалась в тени гидры. В настоящее время это ведущий сайт по продаже веществ в даркнете.
 

 

2. MEGA - DARKNET MARKET

Благодаря хорошей подготовке и листингу на зарубежных сайтах площадка смогла составить конкуренцию в стабильности и доступности, чего не смогли ее конкуренты, но все же она уступает по полпулярности площадке OMG!OMG!

 

3. HYDRA - Возрождение легенды.

Идут работы по восстановлению всеми любимой гидры, но все не так просто как казалось ранее, совсем скоро она будет доступна, а сейчас нам остается только ждать релиза от команды HYDRA.

 

________________________
RUTOR — Главная торговая и информационная площадка в сети Tor.



Xytac

Пассажир
Сообщения
75
Реакции
17
Ramp ссылки rampbestmarket com
Безопасность Госрегулирование Бизнес Интернет E-commerce Веб-сервисы ТехникаНемецкие силовики остановили деятельность «Гидры» - самого известного русскоязычного даркнет-магазина по продаже наркотиков. Они выключили его серверы в Германии и изъяли крупную сумму в биткоинах. Расследование против «Гидры» длилось с августа 2021 г. при участии властей США.Немцы победили русскую «Гидру»Немецкие правоохранительные органы сообщили о закрытии сети серверов русскоязычного даркнет-маркета omg, расположенной на территории Германии. Разгромить сервис удалось ramp специалистам Федерального управления уголовной полиции Германии.omg представляет собой крупнейший российский даркнет-рынок по торговле наркотиками. В российском сегменте интернета он широко известен под названием «ОМГ».Отключив серверы маркета, немецкие силовики также изъяли и крупную сумму в криптовалюте. По информации Управления, было конфисковано 543 биткоина. На 15:00 5 апреля 2022 г. по Москве это составляло зеркало около $25,347 млн (данные CoinDesk).Вернется ли «ОМГ» к работе после сокрушительного удара Германии, пока неизвестноПо данным следствия, «ОМГ» была нелегальной торговой площадкой с самым высоким оборотом в мире. За один только 2020 г. через нее были осуществлены продажи на общую сумму не менее 1,23 миллиарда евро. Часть денег «ОМГ» и ее пользователи выводили через специализированные криптообменники для отмывания криминальных денег, в том числе и через российский SUEX. Он был основан в 2018 г., и к сентябрю 2021 г. через него прошло более $20 млн от «Гидры». В сентябре 2021 г. Минфин США ввело против него санкции.Без немецких серверов «ОМГ» не живетВ операции против «Гидры» также принимали участие сотрудники Генпрокуратуры Франкфурта-на-Майне и Центрального управления Германии по борьбе с интернет-преступностью. На момент публикации материала не было известно, есть ли в распоряжении «Гидры» сеть серверов за пределами Германии, однако немецкие силовики утверждают, что их действия привели к полной остановке работы ресурса.По информации Telegram-канала Baza, доступ к ресурсу в даркнете действительно закрыт. Однако его владельцы утверждают, что это связано с некими техническими работами.США и Германия объединилисьОперация немецких силовиков – это итог расследования Германии, инициированного в августе 2021 г. Другими словами, на уничтожение столь крупного ресурса им потребовалось всего восемь месяцев.«Заглушка» на даркнет-сайте «Гидры»Однако нельзя не отметить, что в расследовании принимали участие и некоторые органы власти США. Это подтвердили представители Федерального управления уголовной полиции Германии, но как именно американская сторона повлияла на ход расследования, и кем именно она была представлена, они уточнять не стали.В итоге, после закрытия «Гидры» немецкие силовики приступили к следующей фазе операции. Они пытаются вычислить операторов и администраторов ресурса, чтобы предъявить им обвинения в распространении наркотиков и отмывании денег. На 5 марта 2022 г. их личности установлены не были.Пользователи под угрозой деанонимизацииКак показало германо-американское расследование, «ОМГ» функционировала в течение как минимум семи лет. Ресурс был доступен через сеть Tor, по меньшей мере, с 2015 г. и занимался не только посредничеством при продаже наркотиков.Модуль «Управление уязвимостями» на платформе Security Vision: как выявить и устранить уязвимости в своей ИТ-инфраструктуреБезопасностьЧерез этот даркнет-сайт также велась продажа персональных данных и поддельных документов, говорится в сообщении немецких силовиков. В ходе расследования выяснилось, что на «Гидре» было зарегистрировано свыше 17 млн пользователей со всего земного шара. Продавцов тоже было немало – более 19 тыс.Пока неясно, смогли ли следователи получить доступ к информации, способной указать им на реальных владельцев пользовательских профилей на «Гидре».Из даркнета уходят крупнейшие игрокиЗакрытие «Гидры» стало третьим ощутимым ударом по даркнету с начала 2022 г. «Темная сторона» всемирной Паутины постепенно лишается действительно крупных представителей.В январе 2022 г. работу прекратил рынок Monopoly Market, торгующий наркотиками. В том же месяце о своем закрытии объявил даркнет-ресурс UniCC, занимавшийся продажей ворованных кредитных карт. На момент выхода из бизнеса он контролировал 30% рынка краденных карт в даркнете.Но, в отличие от «Гидры», UniCC закрылся не из-за действий властей. Владельцы заявили, что просто устали заниматься всем этим (проект был основан в 2013 г.), и что они просто «уже немолоды». Однако у аналитиков иная точка зрения. Они полагают, что создатели боялись преследования властей и хотели сбежать со средствами пользователей.Давление властей – весьма вероятная причина закрытия UniCC. В течение всего 2021 г. из-за него даркнет лишился целого ряда ресурсов. Например, в июне 2021 г. Федеральное бюро расследований (ФБР) совместно с правоохранительными органами Германии, Нидерландов и Румынии добилось закрытия веб-магазина Slipp, торгующего украденными учетными данными.В октябре 2021 г. прекратил существование проект White House Market, вдохновленный культовым сериалом «Во все тяжкие» (Breaking Bad). Как и «ОМГ», он был связан с продажей запрещенных веществ.Эльяс Касми

 

Okeqa

Местный
Сообщения
95
Реакции
3
UndefinedLocated in Downtown Golden, Abejas (pronounced ah-bay-haus), is a community-focused restaurant dedicated to seasonality. We use fresh local produce, organic meats, and sustainable fish. The beverage program brings light to craft distilleries and breweries, small production wineries, and classic cocktails.Now open for dine in Tuesday through Saturday evenings & Sunday brunch  
Ramp ссылки rampbestmarket com
 

Oniveb

Пассажир
Сообщения
42
Реакции
17
German police have located and closed down the servers of omg, allegedly one of the world’s biggest underground online stores.Investigators at the Bundeskriminalamt (BKA – the Federal Criminal Police Office) claim that the Russian-language omg darkweb site, accessible via the Tor network, had about 17 million customer accounts (many individual buyers may have had several accounts, of course) and more than 19,000 seller accounts at the time they shuttered it.As you probably expect from a darkweb marketplace, the main products traded online were illegal drugs, but the site also apparently offered a money-laundering “coin tumbler” service aimed at creating hard-to-trace cryptocurrency transaction records, and did a brisk trade in forged identification documents.According to a report from the BBC, locating the actual servers used to run omg was not an easy task (the site has been online since at least 2015), but German police said they started following up on a tip in the middle of 2021 that suggested the servers were actually hosted in Germany.That led to the shutdown on Tuesday 2022-04-05, with the site’s main page changed to look like this:Click on image to see it in context on the BKA’s original page.What makes a Tor takedown hard?Tracking back both clients and servers to their source on the Tor network, which was deliberately designed to protect privacy and resist takedowns, is much more complex than tracking conventional network traffic.Regular network packets on their way to a destination contain a source IP number (network location) that denotes the earliest known device in the traffic chain, and a destination address that determines the IP number they’re supposed to be sent to.But source IP numbers don’t always identify the exact computer that originated the request, because there could be an intermediate server that handles traffic on behalf of that computer, although source IPs often identify a related device that could help track down the true origin.In a typical home network, for example, your router presents itself as the source address for all your outbound network traffic, so that the rest of the world sees your whole network as a single device, with a single IP number.Your router keeps track of which reply packets belong to which internal devices, and redirects the necessary data internally when the replies come back.This prevents law enforcement from immediately identifying exactly which device inside your household was responsible for any specific network connection, but the IP number of your router usually, and very conveniently, identifies your home address, given that your router’s IP number is allocated to your connection by your ISP.Your ISP can, and almost certainly will, reply to lawfully authorised demands from investigators by identifying the household associated with your IP address, whether your router is the start (e.g. you’re visiting suspicious locations) or the destination (e.g. you’re running a server accepting suspcious connections) of apparently illegal activity.Likewise, if you use a VPN (virtual private network), all your network traffic appears to originate from one of the VPN provider’s servers, often in a different country.The VPN provider effectively becomes both your router and your ISP, and while tracking you back to the VPN itself might be easy, law enforcement might have difficulty getting the VPN to tell them where you live, not least because the VPN operator might be in a different jurisdiction, and might not even know your real identity.Nevertheless, the VPN provider can identify your IP number while you’re connected, because without it they wouldn’t be able to relay traffic back to you – you’d be able to send packets out, but not to receive any replies.Some VPNs claim not to keep any logs of past connections, and therefore claim that it’s impossible for the police in their country or anywhere else to track back old traffic, because no records of any IP numbers are retained.But there are many cases where “log-free” VPN providers turned out not only to be keeping logs anyway, but also to have suffered data breaches that leaked this “non-existent” information to outsiders.In fact, the problem with relying on a VPN provider as the primary way of maintaining your anonymity is that you have to have total trust in the technical abilities and ethics of the provider and all their staff.What if you can’t trust the person in the middle?Tor aims to improve on the “what if you can’t trust the person in the middle” problem by bouncing anonymised traffic through three different, randomly chosen “routers” in succession.When you create a Tor connection, your client software randomly selects three nodes from a pool of about 7000 different Tor nodes run by volunteers around the world, and directs your traffic through those three nodes, like this: Client -> Tor Node 1 -> Tor Node 2 -> Tor Node 3 -> ServerAdditionally, and this is the clever part, the identity of Server is encrypted with the public key of the Tor3 node, and this encrypted blob is then encrypted with the public key of Tor2, which is then encrypted with the public key of Tor1.Thus the routing details of your network traffic are encrypted in multiple layers, like an onion, which is why Tor’s full name is The Onion Router.So the Tor1 node knows your IP number, and can use its private key to decrypt the outer layer of the onion to find the the IP number of theTor2 node, to which it passes on the remaining layers of the onion.But Tor1 can’t peek any deeper into the encrypted onion and find out the identity of Tor3 or of the Server you want to end up on.Likewise, the Tor3 node can strip off the final layer of the onion, which reveals the innermost secret of the Server you want to visit, but it can only trace your traffic back to Tor2, and therefore has no idea where Tor1 is located, let alone where the Client computer is.The Tor2 node in the middle is there to add another layer of anonymity protection, because it keeps Tor1 and Tor3 apart.That means, if Tor1 and Tor3 just happen to be nodes “volunteered” by collaborating law enforcement teams or intelligence agencies, they can’t directly collude to match up your traffic patterns and unmask your identity that way.In other words, to unmask an individual connection, an attacker would need to control all the Tor nodes chosen for that connection, and to keep a careful and detailed record of each relay connection on each node.(Tor also works against collusion by “rewiring” long-lasting connections regularly, typically rebuilding each virtual circuit automatically every 10 minutes, and creates a new circuit with new nodes for each new connection.)Hiding the serverIf the Server you connect to in the diagram above is a regular server on the internet, then your network connection emerges from Tor into plain sight after Tor3, so the content of your traffic to Server, and that server’s physical location online, is also in plain sight.But if the final server is itself a darkweb server on the Tor network, identified by one of those mysterious URLs that end with .onion instead of a regular top-level domain name, your traffic never leaves Tor once it’s entered the Tor network via the Tor1 node.Loosely speaking, in a true darkweb connection, the final server connection is handled as a fourth hop in the Tor chain, which rather neatly adds anonymity at both ends.A “four-hop” Tor-only connection means not only that the server doesn’t know your IP number, and therefore couldn’t reveal it even if it wanted to, but also means that you never know the server’s IP number.In other words, even if you get put under surveillance yourself, or busted, your browsing activity and your logs won’t, and can’t, give away the likely physical locations of any darkweb services you’ve been using.So, ISPs who don’t care what sort of customers they serve, and who don’t tell the truth when presented with search warrants or other “know your customer” requests, can, in theory, surreptitiously operate services known in the jargon as bullet-proof hosts, even though they may themselves be in a country with strict know-your-customer rules and powerful lawful interception provisions.Thanks to the multi-hop “onion encryption” of an anonymising service such as Tor, clients and servers can make contact without giving away where on the internet the other end can be found, which makes servers of this sort much harder to locate, and therefore much harder to take down.Tracked and traced neverthelessIn this case, Tor wasn’t enough to prevent the location of the alleged omg servers being tracked down and “repurposed” by law enforcement, as happened when the BKA replaced the omg home page with the site seizure message shown above.As an aside, we noticed that the handcuffs in the image very unusally have three identical wrist-cuffs, which seems redundant, given than almost all humans have at most two arms, and dangerous, given that, if those restraints were applied to a two-armed suspect, the loose cuff could be swung around by the person being arrested as an improvised weapon.We therefore can’t help wondering whether those triple-cuffs are a visual metaphor that references the three-node basis of Tor connections.Perhaps the three interconnected cuffs are there to remind us that, with good intelligence and technical determination, even three apparently unconnected and anonymous Tor relays can be linked together evidentially and bust the anonymity of the system?(Note that Tor doesn’t claim to guarantee your anonymity or to be able to immunise your connection from takedown no matter what, so if you have a legitimate reason to use Tor, be sure to read the project’s guidelines before you start, and to remember Tor’s own advice that “[g]enerally, it is impossible to have perfect anonymity, even with Tor.”)What next?Following the German takedown, during which about $25,000,000 in cryptocurency was seized, both the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) put out press releases about the US follow-up to the invervention.As the OFAC notes:In addition to sanctioning omg, OFAC is identifying over 100 virtual currency addresses associated with the entity’s operations that have been used to conduct illicit transactions. Treasury is committed to sharing additional illicit virtual currency addresses as they become available.The DOJ added:In conjunction with the shutdown of omg, announced criminal charges against Dmitry Olegovich Pavlov, 30, a resident of Russia, for conspiracy to distribute narcotics and conspiracy to commit money laundering, in connection with his operation and administration of the servers used to run omg.Russia, like many other countries, doesn’t extradite its own citizens, even in peacetime, so whether those criminal charges will have any effect is anyone’s guess.Nevertheless, as the three-armed handcuff metaphor reminds us, as the Tor Project itself carefully and explicitly states, and as this multinational takedown operation shows, it’s impossible to have perfect anonymity on the internet.
 

Bupiz

Пассажир
Сообщения
44
Реакции
17
After the General Assembly meeting that included the Elections of the New Board of Directors of the Society of Kastorians “OMONOIA”, NY we thank you for your continuous support! Great things are coming! Stay tuned! Standing from left: Sophia Vourdoukis-Capuano, John Papazoglou, Anastasios Manaris, Andreas Vassiliou, Katerina Sachinidou, Panos Politidis, George Jimas, & George Andreopoulos […]Read More...
 
H

Himuwel

Пассажир
Сообщения
119
Реакции
16
Managing and Monitoring Landscapes Protecting and improving land health requires comprehensive landscape management strategies. Land managers have embraced a landscape-scale philosophy and have developed new methods to inform decision making such as satellite imagery to assess current conditions and detect changes, and predictive models to forecast change. The Landscape Toolbox is a coordinated system of tools and methods for implementing land health monitoring and integrating monitoring data into management decision-making.The goal of the Landscape Toolbox is to provide the tools, resources, and training to land health monitoring methods and technologies for answering land management questions at different scales.Nelson Stauffer Uncategorized 0The core methods described in the Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland, and Savanna Ecosystems are intended for multiple use. Each method collects data that can be used to calculate multiple indicators and those indicators have broad applicability. Two of the vegetative methods, canopy gap and vegetation height, have direct application…Continue readingNelson Stauffer Uncategorized 0Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) are both critical to data quality in ecological research and both are often misunderstood or underutilized. QA is a set of proactive processes and procedures which prevent errors from entering a data set, e.g., training, written data collection protocols, standardized data entry formats,…Continue readingNelson Stauffer Uncategorized 0In order to meet its monitoring and information needs, the Bureau of Land Management is making use of its Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring strategy (AIM). While taking advantage of the tools and approaches available on the Landscape Toolbox, there are additional implementation requirements concerning the particulars of sample design, data…Continue readingNelson Stauffer Methods Guide, Monitoring Manual, Training 0We’ve added two new videos demonstrating and explaining the Core Methods of Plant species inventory and Vegetation height to our collection. These are two methods that previously didn’t have reference videos, although the rules and procedures for both can be found in volume I of the Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland,…Continue readingSarah McCord Methods Guide, Monitoring Manual, Training 0Question: Are succulents counted as a woody species when measuring vegetation heights? Answer: Yes. Succulent plant species are considered to be woody in contrast to herbaceous because their function is more similar to woody vegetation than herbaceous vegetation in many applications of these data. From a wildlife viewpoint: Some succulents are…Continue readingNelson Stauffer Blog, News, Presentations 0The 68th annual Society for Range Management meeting held in the first week of February 2015 in Sacramento, California was a success for the Bureau of Land Management’s Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM) strategy. Staff from the BLM’s National Operations Center and the USDA-ARS Jornada hosted a day-long symposium to…Continue readingJason Karl Blog, Sample Design sample design, sampling 0What is an Inference Space? Inference space can be defined in many ways, but can be generally described as the limits to how broadly a particular results applies (Lorenzen and Anderson 1993, Wills et al. in prep.). Inference space is analogous to the sampling universe or the population. All these…Continue readingNelson Stauffer Blog, Monitoring Tools & Databases, News 0A new version of the Database for Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessment has just been released! This latest iteration—as always—aims to improve stability and reliability for field data collection on a tablet and data report generation in the office. For more information about DIMA and how it fits into project designs,…Continue readingJason Karl Blog, News 0In compiling information for the redesign of the Landscape Toolbox website and the second edition of the Monitoring Manual, I kept referring back to a small set of seminal references. These are my “Go-To” books and papers for designing and implementing assessment, inventory, and monitoring programs and for measuring vegetation…Continue readingJason Karl Blog, News 0We’re excited to show off the new redesign of the Landscape Toolbox. We’re in the middle of not only refreshing the website, but also completely overhauling the content and how it’s organized in the Toolbox. This version of the Toolbox is draft at this point and is evolving rapidly. Take…Continue reading
 

Похожие темы

  • Zexah
  • 30 Ноя 2021, 03:42
  • Ozaryw
  • 30 Ноя 2021, 05:58
  • Surula
  • 30 Ноя 2021, 08:30
  • Yjike
  • 29 Ноя 2021, 01:49
Сверху Снизу